Do brazilians care about improving their country?

Children, Prostitution, Poverty, Crime, Drugs, Health

Postby Al Bundy » Sun May 25, 2003 5:03 pm

blablabla wrote:Here is the ranking of standard of living

(shut up ignorant gringo) get facts straight...hahahahahahah

1
Canadá
0,932

2
Noruega
0,927

3
Estados Unidos
0,927

4
Japão
0,924

5
Bí©lgica
0,923

6
Suí©cia
0,923

7
Austrália
0,922

8
Paí­ses Baixos (Holanda)
0,921

9
Islí¢ndia
0,919

10
Reino Unido
0,918

11
França
0,918

12
Suí­ça
0,914

13
Finlí¢ndia
0,913

14
Alemanha
0,906

15
Dinamarca
0,905

16
íustria
0,904

17
Luxemburgo
0,902

18
Nova Zelí¢ndia
0,901

19
Itália
0,900

20
Irlanda
0,900

21
Espanha
0,894

22
Cingapura
0,888

23
Israel
0,883

24
Hong Kong (parte da China)
0,880

25
Brunei
0,878

26
Chipre
0,870

27
Grí©cia
0,867

28
Portugal
0,858

29
Barbados
0,857

30
Corí©ia do Sul
0,852

31
Bahamas
0,851

32
Malta
0,850

33
Eslovíªnia
0,845

34
Chile
0,844

35
Kuwait
0,833

36
República Tcheca
0,833

37
Bahrein
0,832

38
Antí­gua e Barbuda
0,828

39
Argentina
0,827

40
Uruguai
0,826

41
Catar
0,814

42
Eslováquia
0,813

43
Emirados írabes Unidos
0,812

44
Polí´nia
0,802

45
Costa Rica
0,801

46
Trinidad e Tobago
0,797

47
Hungria
0,795

48
Venezuela
0,792

49
Panamá
0,791

50
Mí©xico
0,786

51
São Cristovão e Ní©vis
0,781

52
Granada
0,777

53
Dominica
0,776

54
Estí´nia
0,773

55
Croácia
0,773

56
Malásia
0,768

57
Colí´mbia
0,768

58
Cuba
0,765

59
Maurí­cio
0,764

60
Belarus
0,763

61
Fiji
0,763

62
Lituí¢nia
0,761

63
Bulgária
0,758

64
Suriname
0,757

65
Lí­bia
0,756

66
Seychelles
0,755

67
Tailí¢ndia
0,753

68
Romíªnia
0,752

69
Lí­bano
0,749

70
Samoa
0,747

71
Rússia
0,747

72
Equador
0,747

73
Macedí´nia
0,746

74
Letí´nia
0,744

75
São Vicente e Granadinas
0,744

76
Casaquistão
0,740

77
Filipinas
0,740

78
Arábia Saudita
0,740

79
BRASIL
0,739

80
Peru
0,739

81
Santa Lúcia
0,737

82
Jamaica
0,734

83
Belize
0,732

84
Paraguai
0,730

85
Geórgia
0,729

86
Turquia
0,728

87
Armíªnia
0,728

88
Republica Dominicana
0,726

89
Omã
0,725

90
Sri Lanka
0,721

91
Ucrí¢nia
0,721

92
Usbequistão
0,720

93
Maldivas
0,716

94
Jordí¢nia
0,715

95
Irã
0,715

96
Turcomenistão
0,712

97
Quirguí­zia
0,702

98
CHINA
0,701

99
Guiana
0,701

100
Albí¢nia
0,699

101
ífrica do Sul
0,695

102
Tuní­sia
0,695

103
Azerbaijão
0,695

104
Moldávia
0,683

105
Indoní©sia
0,681

106
Cabo Verde
0,677

107
El Salvador
0,674

108
Tajiquistão
0,665

109
Argí©lia
0,665

110
Vietnã
0,664

111
Sí­ria
0,663

112
Bolí­via
0,652

113
Suazilí¢ndia
0,644

114
Honduras
0,641

115
Namí­bia
0,638

116
Vanuatu
0,627

117
Guatemala
0,624

118
Ilhas Salomão
0,623

119
Mongólia
0,618

120
Egito
0,616

121
Nicarágua
0,616

122
Botsuana
0,609

123
São Tomí© e Prí­ncipe
0,609

124
Gabão
0,607

125
Iraque
0,586

126
Marrocos
0,582

127
Lesoto
0,582

128
Mianmá
0,580

129
Papua-Nova Guiní©
0,570

130
Zimbábue
0,560

131
Guiní© Equatorial
0,549

132
índia
0,545

133
Gana
0,544

134
Camarões
0,536

135
Congo
0,533

136
Quíªnia
0,519

137
Camboja
0,514

138
Paquistão
0,508

139
Comores
0,506

140
Laos
0,491

141
Rep. Democrática do Congo
0,479

142
Sudão
0,475

143
Togo
0,469

144
Nepal
0,463

145
Butão
0,459

146
Nigí©ria
0,456

147
Madagascar
0,453

148
Iíªmen
0,449

149
Maurití¢nia
0,447

150
Bangladesh
0,440

151
Zí¢mbia
0,431

152
Haiti
0,430

153
Senegal
0,426

154
Costa do Marfim
0,422

155
Benin
0,421

156
Tanzí¢nia
0,421

157
Djibuti
0,412

158
Uganda
0,404

159
Malavi
0,399

160
Angola
0,398

161
Guiní©
0,398

162
Chade
0,393

163
Gí¢mbia
0,391

164
Ruanda
0,379

165
República Centro-Africana
0,378

166
Mali
0,375

167
Eritrí©ia
0,346

168
Guiní©-Bissau
0,343

169
Moçambique
0,341

170
Burundi
0,324

171
Burkina Fasso
0,304

172
Etiópia
0,298

173
Ní­ger
0,298

174
Serra Leoa
0,254


Well put.
Al Bundy
 

Postby Macunaima » Sun May 25, 2003 6:04 pm

No sooner do I mention I purple-assed baboon's bunghole than one shows up.... :twisted:
"Brazil is the country of the future and always will be."
User avatar
Macunaima
Coaraci
 
Posts: 9202
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 2:08 pm

Postby blablabla » Sun May 25, 2003 9:32 pm

This ranking is from UN

If you really believe that China is in a better position that Brazil I only can say that you r a big ignorant.
blablabla
 

Postby Macunaima » Tue May 27, 2003 8:27 am

So, Blablabla...

I ask for your data's background and all you can tell me is "it's from the U.N."?

That's not good enough, son.

The U.N. is hardly a monolithic organization, nor are its branches apolitical. Read, up above... the part where I mentioned that this data contradicts that churned out by the U.S. Center for Dissease Control...

But most importantly, one needs to know WHAT'S being counted and compared here. Again, "standard of living" is an abstract concept. One can't go out and count incidences of "standard of living" the way one can count banana merchants at the feira: it is a constructed concept.

The first thing that needs to be asked, then, is WHAT are they counting? If they don't bother to tell you, it's a great indication that this particular piece of statistical work is what we in the biz call "fluff".

So Blablabla, seeing as how you brought these stats up and spammed us with them, don't you think you should at least be polite and give us the most important part of the info, what they count?

What? You don't have it? Oh. I'm sorry. I mistook you for someone who was actually making an attempt at creating an informed opinion, and not just a brainless monkey who knows how to do Yahoo Search and cut-and-paste.

Nevermind.
"Brazil is the country of the future and always will be."
User avatar
Macunaima
Coaraci
 
Posts: 9202
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 2:08 pm

Postby blablabla » Tue May 27, 2003 12:48 pm

Any1 who knows what IDH means can say what they counted and compared...
blablabla
 

Postby Macunaima » Tue May 27, 2003 5:58 pm

That simply changes one abstract for another. WHAT, exactly, were they counting and how did they go about it? C'mon Blabster, this isn't tough data to dig up and it's common knowledge that stats should be accompanied with all the requisite info on how they were made.

You've dodged the question twice now... Wassamatter? In over your head? :twisted:
"Brazil is the country of the future and always will be."
User avatar
Macunaima
Coaraci
 
Posts: 9202
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 2:08 pm

Postby armando » Wed May 28, 2003 9:05 pm

Macunaima,
Please excuse the late response!You said"
Unfortunately, "common knowledge" is often simply a euphemism for prejudice.

Where Armando gets his info from is an open guess. AFAIK, this years' murder stats haven't been compiled yet and last years show us behind plenty of "democratic" countries: Colombia and Jamaica, to name just two. (Though what in the hell Armando means by "the democratic world" is also anyone's guess.) ".

Actually, for the year 2002 jamaica's murder rate was slightly lower than that of brazil and I sincerely don't think that it's a good idea touting columbia as an example ,after all,the country is officially experiencing an organized civil war.

"In terms of favelas, last I saw, we were far behind Mexico. A favela, in any case, is a pretty local phenomenon. The very word itself is Brazilian. So, again, what Armando is comparing when he sets our favela count off against other nations' is anyone's guess. "

Wrong again! the amount of violence that takes place in mexico's worse communities isn't as bad as those of brazilian favelas.You see,the favelas are all but in a class of their own ,when it come to violence,poverty,misery and deprivation in the free world.

"Furthermore, what the hell, exactly, is "a third world nation"? "

Well,as disparaging as the label may be,it basicly ranks nations according to certain criteria such as-level of industrialization,gdp,per capita income/spending power,literacy rates,quality of life index.How healthy a given population is etc..

I mean,there's no arguing that bostwana is a third world nation and france is not.Likewise, there's no way in hell that brazil could be considered a developed nation when a little over half of it's population doesn't even graduate high school.

"And finally, as for Brazil "exploding", not even Rio de Janeiro is likely to explode (at least any more than it has in the past) in the near future."

Well,even some brazilian experts are theorizing the impending doom to come in brazil.Look around!


"Let's move on...

""Crime run amock and huges swarths of the country brimming over with deperately poor and illeterate people.""

"Now I'm not one to trash on folk's grammar or spelling errors, but it does seem ironic to me that Armando feels fit to judge others' illiteracy without even knowing how to spell the word himself, let alone "desperately" or "amok". (I particularly like the use of "swarths", btw, Armando. That's a new one...) "

Lol! I'd say that there a big difference between typos,mis-spellings and not being able to read and write in one's native tongue,As sooooo many brazilians seem to be.For this we should primarily blame the brazilian government,aye?

"As for crime, what we're seeing is a slight increase in what's been the normal rate for SP and RdJ for over a decade. This hardly qualifies as a potential explosion, nor does it justify tarring the entire country with these two cities' problems, however grave they may be."

Well,the thing is amigo....most of the murders that occur in industrialized democracies happen near big cities and regradless of wether or not most of brazil's homicides take place in/around rio or sao paulo,the country still has a ridiculously high murder rate.Last year it was close to 39,000 and that's more than some countries who're officially at war with other countries.


"Another wonderfully ascriptive statement backed up by no data of any kind, whatsofuckingever. f****d though the authorities may be, I hardly think their keystone cop-like antics qualify as gross disinterest in the citizenry's welfare. Rank incompetence, maybe."

Well,I happen to believe that brazil actually has enormous potential and could become a major player internationally,if the government and people would get more serious about life and invest more into the education,health and well-being of it's citizenry,instead of carnival and samba schools.


"Armando, of course, knows EXACTLY what this country's ills are, even though he probably can't speak the language and would have a hard time identifying the dates of such major Brazilian historical events as abolition, independence or even the 1964 coup. This is the typical view of - for lack of a better descriptive term - colonialist fuckwits. They already KNOW everything they think the need to about a country before they set foot in it, so what they see there just confirms their prejudices. When the better educated brand of native disagrees with them, they get all huffy and puffy over said native's ignorance. How DARE that uppity little wog contradict Armando's deep Brazilian knowledge? Truly, one simply can't understand how these Brazilians can be so irrational... "

Yes,you're correct, I'm an intruder- gringo socialist,don't speak a lick of portugese,but ponder this:I still have much concern for the progress of the brazilian masses.

"Again, "third world" isn't even defined by Armando, simply used as a neat little blocking device which, magically, throws Brazil in the same boat, developmentally speaking, with India and China - despite these three countries MASSIVE historical, cultural and economic differences. This is simply fuzzy thinking at its best, made all the more delightfully ironic seeing as how it comes at a time when China has had to admit to dropping the ball over SARS... "

I pointed out these these two nations,because they're classified(along with brazil)as mid income developing countries,yet still they have recently moved way ahead of brazil in terms of development & education.

"Well, that's that then. Forget all those upper and middle class people who donate time and money to improvement projects here in Brazil. They simply don't exist because Armando and his ilk have decreed them to be irrelevant. And as for the "poverty line", even this simple stat, which can easily be found on the IBGE website, Armando blows. About 20 percent to a third of Brazil lives below the poverty line. That's quite enough, thank you. No need to exagerate an already bad situation. What one could do about that, however, is anyone's guess. Certainly, education can't hurt. But there are plenty of overeducated, underemployed people already living in Brazil (I'm one). What adding to their ranks will do in terms of ending poverty, nobody can say. Perhaps it'll eventually generate enough resentment to blow the lid off this thing and have a real revolution, but I very much doubt it."

This I find too funny,because you're pointing out a handfull of the better off in brazil,who're proactive in helping the poor,but the fact remains that they are greatly out-numbered by mid/upper class brazilians who don't give a rat's ass what poor people are going through.

"Perhaps. Though "human potential", in and of itself, isn't necessarily generative of wealth. Furthermore, most of the folks who are poor - the worst off in fact - don't even LIVE IN THE FAVELAS!!! Nor are most of the people who live in the favelas illiterate (though ~I'm beginning to wonder about Armando...) Here we can see that Armando's completely farting out his mouth. A simple search on the IBGE website would give him enough damning stats to write a decent critique of Brazil, but he can't even be bothered to do that, prefering to simply INVENT whatever the hell he pleases and argue it from there. "

Well,It's not so much that the favelados are more impoverished than rural brazilians(per se),it's just that they live in much more hazardous environments.Plus,common sense would dicatte that rural brazilians have greater access to food stuffs and don't live in environs that are as violent and mentally & physically as depressing as the favelas.

"This tells us all we need to know about the depth of information behind Armando's opinions.

"chacho"

Did you perhaps mean "tchau" Armando, or is this something new like "swarths"? "

Na! I'm not brazilian or latin,I just chose chacho(short for muchacho)as a screen name,only to find out that it was already taken here,so I then opted for armando(the name of a close friend).:)

armando
armando
Fulano/a
 
Posts: 4
Joined: Tue May 27, 2003 7:38 pm

Postby Macunaima » Thu May 29, 2003 10:01 am

"Actually, for the year 2002 jamaica's murder rate was slightly lower than that of brazil..."

Where does that stat come from? I'd be interested in checking it out. Even if it was "slightly lower" this means that Brazil and Jamaica are about on the same level as far as violence is concerned. Jamaica, I will point out, ISN'T undergoing a civil war and is not understood as a nation in imminent danger of disolution.

"The amount of violence that takes place in mexico's worse communities isn't as bad as those of brazilian favelas.You see,the favelas are all but in a class of their own ,when it come to violence,poverty,misery and deprivation in the free world."

Again, Armando, this is an attribution that isn't backed up by any data at all. I could just as easily say that favelas are wonderfully peaceful communities. My roomate spent years living in shanty towns in Mexico and favelas here in Rio and he considers the violence level to be about the same, though he classifies Mexican corruption as higher. Where are you getting your facts from? My roomate at least has had the advantage of seeing things with his own eyes...

One first needs to define what, exactly, is a favela. According to Lygia Valadares, widely recognized as THE Brazilian expert on this topic, favelas are simply squatted communities. They aren't "shanty towns", because there are shanty towns that aren't considered favelas and there are favelas that aren't shanty towns. They aren't necessarily poor, because there are favelas that are actually much better off than certain neighborhoods. Vidigal, for example, is doing much better these days than, say, certain sections of Realengo. Some of the worst violence in Rio is, in fact, happening in working class communities in the baixada that are not considered to be favelas BY ANYONE.

"Well,as disparaging as the label may be,it basicly ranks nations according to certain criteria such as-level of industrialization,gdp,per capita income/spending power,literacy rates,quality of life index.How healthy a given population is etc... I mean,there's no arguing that bostwana is a third world nation and france is not."

No, son, Botswana's a POOR nation and France is a RICH one. "Third World" is something else again. In any case, that comprehensive ranking system you describe doesn't exist anywhere. "Quality of life index" is my personal fave. As a social anthropologist, I love this stat because it creates the illusion that something as ephemeral and subjective as "quality of life" can be easily pigeonholed, counted and compared. This is simply a load of bollocks and if you look at what it is they're actually counting in these indexes, it's generally such shite as "numbers of bathrooms per person".

"Likewise, there's no way in hell that brazil could be considered a developed nation when a little over half of it's population doesn't even graduate high school."

"Developed" is another one of my favorite euphemisms. You people toss this word around as if it meant something. Check out its dictionary definition, why don't you. A country is not a roll of film: it is not over or under developed. History "develops" all countries but develops them in different directions and for different things. In Brazil, we are quite well-developed, thank you. The question is "developed for what?"

If you mean to say "rich and poor countries", just say that and avoid all these pseudo-scientific terms like "third world" and "underdeveloped" which mean, in the final analysis EXACTLY THE SAME THING. If you're talking about economics, talk about economics and have done with it. Avoid the cheap tabloid buzzwords.

"Well,even some brazilian experts are theorizing the impending doom to come in brazil.Look around!"

Who, exactly, are these experts and what are their credentials? Believe me, I keep a pretty good eye on these things and aside from the usual passel of Chicken Littles making media hay while the sun shines, I'm not noticing too many people with this opinion. Responsible analysts say, basically, that things are bad, but then again, they've always been that way and now, finally, we are beginning to notice them because the "badness" is no longer geographically contained.

"Lol! I'd say that there a big difference between typos,mis-spellings and not being able to read and write in one's native tongue,As sooooo many brazilians seem to be.For this we should primarily blame the brazilian government,aye?"

Again, where is your data to back this up? Something on the order of 20 percent of U.S. Americans are functionally illiterate, according to the President's Council on Literacy, and that's probably a low estimate. Last I saw, "official" illiteracy in Brazil was clocking in at around 15-20 percent, which probably puts the functional illiteracy rate at double that. 30 to 40 percent is bad, yes, but when compared to the richest nation in the world's 20 percent, it takes on a different light.

Furthermore, YOU are obviously not even close to illiterate or poor, having access to a computer, the internet and knowing how to use them. Thus your repeated mispellings of "illiterate" as "illeterate" are, aside from hilarious, the mark of either laziness or stupidity. Now, again, I'm usually not one to crank on people's grammar errors. Lord knows I make more than my share. However, I'm also not the one accusing Brazilians of illiteracy in an English that could be charitably described as that of a fourth grader....

"Well,the thing is amigo....most of the murders that occur in industrialized democracies happen near big cities and regradless of wether or not most of brazil's homicides take place in/around rio or sao paulo,the country still has a ridiculously high murder rate.Last year it was close to 39,000 and that's more than some countries who're officially at war with other countries."

Again, where do you find these numbers? Do you just pull them out of your arse? I could say that I heard that the murder total in Brazil last year was actually 330. That's as reasonable a statistic as the one you just cited, for all we know here. ONCE MORE: either attribute your stats or don't bother giving them. Anyone can make numbers up and most people do.

Finally, the point, my dear Armando, isn't that Brazil's murder rate is low or acceptable. The point is that it is roughly as high AS IT HAS ALWAYS BEEN. Given that not much has changed, why, then, the chorus of Cassandra's such as yourself chanting on and on about our country's onrushing doom?

In short, Armando, what has changed in Brazil that makes you and others feel that the situation is now "out of control" where basically same situation was "under control" three years ago? Why are you noticing our urban chaos now and why has it migrated from page thirty to page two of the world's newspapers?

THAT is the question, Armando, and if you wish me to believe that this change is due to the high increase in murders, then you're going to have to show that such a huge increase has, indeed, taken place. It simply hasn't. Where's the data to back up your claims?

"...if the government and people would get more serious about life and invest more into the education,health and well-being of it's citizenry,instead of carnival and samba schools."

Armando, take a look at the education budget of Brazil, then take a look at the budget of the Samba School Federation of Rio de Janeiro and tell me that the second budget is anything but a drop in comparison with the first. Furthermore, the samba schools of Rio MAKE huge amounts of money in tourism revenues, taxes, sales, etc. The modest quantities they receive from EMBRTUR are more than paid back by the boost they inject into the local economy every February. Samba schools are a VERY serious business, boyo, and only a complete nebbish would think differently.

So your opinion on this point, my lad, is nothing more than thinly disguised prejudice. What you really want to say is "Those damned Brazilians party too much instead of studying, the stupid little monkeys." This, of course, is pure unadulterated bullshit. Carnaval and the government's support for it generates revenues; it does not detract from them. The state of health and education in Brazil has NOTHING at all to do with Carnaval, so why even bring them up in the same breath? And you have the gall to call yourself a socialist? Since when has this sort of chauvinism been "in" in socialist circles?

"Yes,you're correct, I'm an intruder- gringo socialist,don't speak a lick of portugese,but ponder this:I still have much concern for the progress of the brazilian masses."

Armando, it's not your gringo status that concerns me but your ABYSMAL ignorance regarding things Brazilian COMBINED with said status. If you were a Brazilian, I'd find your ignorance shameful and worthy of ridicule. As a gringo, your ignorance is merely annoying. The problem, however, is that you feel that your opinion - no matter how prejudiced and/or poorly informed - should be respected simply because it is yours. Bollocks! If you can't bother to inform yourself properly about a topic that you are obviously passionate about, then you are simply a fool and would do well to keep your damned trap shut. We have enough citizen fools that we don't need to go looking for the imported variety, thanks. Citizens fools at least have to vote, which makes their opinions, however fatuous, of some value. Of what value is yours?

"I pointed out these these two nations [China and India],because they're classified(along with brazil)as mid income developing countries,yet still they have recently moved way ahead of brazil in terms of development & education."

Armando, I can classify baseballs and oranges as round objects, but that doesn't make them both good to eat. The problem here is not that your classification presumes that these countries have something in common, but that that something in common allows one to critique Brazil's "perfomance" relative to China's. "Mid income developing countries" is a category that says nothing about a nation's history, political conjunctures, cultures, or anything else of import. It simply says the nations aren't as poor as some nor as rich as others and that they are progressing (we presume) towards some undefined state. Well, damn, Armando, that kind of description is so f*****g vague as to be a non-description. "Developing"...? Towards what may I ask?

"This I find too funny,because you're pointing out a handfull of the better off in brazil,who're proactive in helping the poor,but the fact remains that they are greatly out-numbered by mid/upper class brazilians who don't give a rat's ass what poor people are going through."

And your opinion is based on what, I might ask? The vast number of Brazilians who know and chat with here in Brazil? How can you have an informed opinion on something as complicated and subtle as this, Armando, when, as you freely admit, you don't even speak Portuguese? You can't even talk to the vast majority of the better off in Brazil, yet you presume to know everything about them! Again, Armando, it's not so much the fact that you are a gringo that worries me. I, too, am a gringo, after all. It's the fact that you smuggly feel that your bloody ignorance is as worthy as a properly researched and informed opinion.

FACT, Armando: you WANT to hate the Brazilian upper class so you look for reasons to do so. Now, far be it for me to defend the Mauricinhos and Patricinhas, but I don't find them to be any more - or less - morally objectionable than, say, the elites of Britain and the U.S. who also suck the blood of our poor and don't even have the common decency to admit to themselves that they are doing it. At least our native elite are AWARE of what they're doing and don't try to mask it with tea-party euphemisms such as "development" and "third world".

"Well,It's not so much that the favelados are more impoverished than rural brazilians(per se),it's just that they live in much more hazardous environments."

Bullshit again, Armando. I suggest you check into the stats for average life expectancy in rural and urban impoverished Brazil. Take a look at the sugar inductry and see the living and working conditions its laborers are forced to put up with. Take a look at the infant mortality rates in the Sertão. You'll quit nannering on about "hazardous urban environments" quite quickly, I assure you.

Bottom line, Armando: the vast majority of our urban poor came here to ESCAPE from the rural conditions they were subjected to. As bad as things are here, they were WORSE back in the roça. Think I'm talking out my arse? Stroll on down to the Feira de São Cristovão any Sunday and chat with the immigrants there. Oh, I'm sorry. You don't speak Portuguese.

Again, Armando, if you're going to bother enough about Brazil to get your titties in a twist about our supposed lack of "development", don't you think it would be wise to at least READ a bit about the country (beyond a couple of three paragraph blurbs in the Economist, I mean)? Don't you think you should make an attempt to learn the country's language? And wouldn't you agree AFTER you've acquired at least the rudiments of understanding needed to adequately analyze something as complex as a nation of 180 million people?
"Brazil is the country of the future and always will be."
User avatar
Macunaima
Coaraci
 
Posts: 9202
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2003 2:08 pm

Previous

Return to Social Issues

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests